by Peter Arenstam

The Elizabeth Tilley at sail.
In 1626 an “ingenious man that was a house carpenter” as
described by William Bradford in his history of Plymouth Colony,
sawed in half one of the larger shallops. He lengthened the
vessel five or six feet, raised the side planking some, and
laid a deck on her. In this way the colonists were able to
keep goods, and themselves, safe as they transported corn
to trade with Native People up the Kennebec River in Maine.
Presumably, as an assistant to the governor, John Howland
was one of the number involved in these ventures.
In the spring of 2000, the president of the Pilgrim John
Howland Society approached me about building a replica of
the decked vessel John Howland sailed in to the trading post
in Maine. The society’s plan was to have a shallop built,
launch it in Plymouth harbor, and after a suitable period
of sea trials head off to Maine, re-creating one of the trips
their Pilgrim ancestor made. We came to an agreement on the
price and a time frame in which the boat would be built. After
the excitement of landing such a unique and challenging project
died away, the Maritime Artisans staff was left with two daunting
questions. What did a lengthened and decked over shallop look
like? And how would we build it?
William Baker, designer of the shallop exhibited next to
Mayflower II in Plymouth harbor, compiled a great deal of
research regarding the characteristics of the 17th-century
boat type. His work lead him to the conclusion that in most
cases a shallop was an open rowing and sailing vessel built
to carry cargo, used for fishing, or just traveling on the
water. This variety of employment meant a shallop could be
either constructed with large frames and thick planking able
to withstand rugged use or lightly planked and sparsely framed
for increased speed under oars.
Images of shallops can be found in many period illustrations
of port scenes, fishing communities and views of river traffic.
The type was common to many European countries. From the Dutch
sloep, the French chaloupe, the Portuguese chalupa, to the
German schlup Baker notes the English shallop shared an ancestry
with all these vessels.
The individual characteristics of a shallop could vary as
widely from country to country as the spelling of its name.
For example, a chalupa from 1565 recovered from a Basque whaling
station in Red Bay Labrador was built with carvel or smooth
planking on the bottom, and lapstrake, or overlapping planks,
on the topsides. It had two masts likely rigged with square
sails and was double ended (pointed at both ends). Another
shallop, a Dutch sloep, is described in 1671 as being built
entirely of lapstrake construction with no sailing rig and
a transom stern, (pointed in the front and flat in the back.)
Decked-over shallops are mentioned in colonial records. In
Baker’s Sloops & Shallops, he notes in 1632 a fur trader’s
shallop from Maryland, the Firefly, was decked for half her
length to protect trade goods. Fishermen in Marblehead, MA
added a partial deck to a shallop in 1670 and made use of
the protection the deck provided by installing a chimney in
one of the resulting “rooms.”
Besides being used independently, a shallop was often employed
as a tender to another vessel; sometimes it retrieved anchors
or other heavy objects or as a means of transportation among
a fleet sailing in company. A shallop would be taken aboard
the larger vessels when they sailed on voyages to the New
World. It could be broken down into pieces and stowed below
decks until needed for traveling along the coast. Captain
John Smith’s chaloupe en fagot, used to explore the Chesapeake
in 1607, was one such boat. The shallop that the Pilgrims
brought with them on the Mayflower in 1620 was another. Governor
Bradford describes the stowing of the shallop:
They having brought a large shallop with them out of
England, stowed in quarters in the ship, they now got her
out and set their carpenters to work to trim her up; but
being much bruised and shattered in the ship with foul weather,
they saw she would be long in mending.
The 16 to 17 days the carpenter spent rebuilding and refurbishing
the shallop was the beginning of the colony’s boat building
efforts. Also during that time men were employed in sawing
out planks for a new shallop. In the very first days the colonists
recognized the importance of acquiring vessels for transportation.
In 1623 a small vessel, the Little James, arrived in Plymouth.
The 44-tun vessel had been built in England especially to
support the colony’s maritime activities. However, the vessel
suffered from a series of unfortunate occurrences and remained
with the colony for only two years. On returning from a lack-luster
trading voyage to the Narragansetts the vessel ran afoul of
Brown’s Bank during a storm and lost its main mast. The next
season, on a fishing voyage while at Damariscove Island in
Maine, a storm “drove her against great rocks, which beat
such a hole in her bilge as a horse and cart might have gone
in.” The Little James was raised and repaired. In 1625 she
was loaded with trade goods and sent back to England. Just
as she was reaching the English Channel pirates took her and
sold off the goods.
The same year the Little James arrived, a boat builder was
sent to Plymouth to bolster the small collection of boats
the colony owned. Although he was only in the colony for less
than a year, he was able, with the help of some of the colonists,
to build two strong shallops, a lighter, (a kind of barge),
and hewed out timbers for two ketches. After all that labor,
Bradford relates the boat builder "fell into a fever in the
hot season of the year, and though he had the best means the
place could afford, yet he died."
After the ill fated Little James was sent back to England
in 1625 with its hold full of trade goods, the colonists were
left with the two shallops that the boat builder had built
the previous year. One of the shallops was used in an attempt
to generate revenue for the colony. They laid a little deck
over the midships section to protect a cargo of corn, and
Edward Winslow, among others, used it for a successful trading
voyage to the Kennebec.
Even with the little deck on the shallop, the colonists felt
they ran a great hazard in traveling such a long way in basically
an open boat. They realized the need for a larger vessel to
safely continue trading in Maine. But as the boat builder
had died the previous year, it was left to a house carpenter,
who had worked with the boat builder, to attempt to modify
one of their shallops. The house carpenter "took one of the
biggest of their shallops and sawed her in the middle, and
so built her up and laid a deck on her." This vessel, Bradford
reports, provided good service to the colony for seven years.
It is this vessel that we recently replicated for the Howland
Society. Fortunately, no one fell down dead after completing
the project and we hope that the shallop will last more than
seven years!
Since the shallop Plimoth Plantation Inc. owns is not available
to be sawn in half, and it did not make sense to saw in half
a newly-built boat, we settled on building a larger version
of the 33' shallop William Baker designed in 1957. However
it is not enough just to add five or six feet to the middle
of the Baker shallop design as the resulting vessel would
be too narrow for its length to be safe. Also, Bradford relates
the house carpenter, along with adding length and a deck,
raised the sides making it a larger vessel all around. These
modifications led us to believe the best way to proceed was
to use the 17th-century system of naval architecture and draft
a larger vessel that would reflect the additions the house
carpenter incorporated in 1626.
It is commonly assumed the 17th-century boat builder relied
on inherited information and that he designed and built boats
“by eye.” While experience passed from one generation to the
next was important, the builder had access to a system of
naval architecture known as whole moulding. Howard Chapelle
relates in his book, American Small Sailing Craft, that this
system was used well before 1600 and continued until the end
of the 18th century and is related to the system for ship
design written about by Mathew Baker in 1586.
Mathew Baker was a master shipwright during Queen Elizabeth
I’s reign. His work, Fragments of Ancient ShipWrightery, spells
out the geometrical and mathematical principles of using arcs
of circles either individually or in combination with other
arcs and straight lines to describe the lines of ships. Along
with other lines used to control the emerging shape the shipwright
could, once the principle dimensions of keel length, breadth
and depth of the ship were given by the owner, produce a set
of drawings from which the ship was built.
In A Treatise on Shipbuilding written between 1620 and 1625
the unknown author explained in a step-by-step fashion the
process of designing a ship. There were rules to determine
the size and locations of all the timbers and the proportions
applied to the design. This work is believed to be related
to if not copied from Baker’s Fragments.
The process of designing in this period started with drawing
out the shape of the backbone, that is, the stem, keel and
sternpost. Next, two sets of lines known as rising and narrowing
lines were drawn. They were all based on arcs of circles with
varying radii and were used to determine the shape of the
vessel at each frame location or station. One set of these
lines dictated how wide and how high the floor of the frame
is from the keel. Another set of lines determined how wide
and how high the beam of the vessel is at each station. In
a ship there could be as many as four or five different arcs
of circles connected to make a frame shape. The frames for
a boat could be designed with as few as one or two arcs.
The drawing that displays all the frame shapes is called
the body plan. In the whole moulding process once the designer
has determined the mid-ship, or largest frame, he can use
a pattern of it to determine and draw out the shape of all
the other frames in the boat. Determining the mid-ship frame
is the key to the whole process. That shape can be found either
mathematically or as William Sutherland in The Ship Builder’s
Assistant, or Marine Architecture, written in 1794, suggests:
…the sweeps can be formed; if by no other means, by
repeated trials till they are made to please the fancy and
judgment of the artist…Though several ships may be made
of the same breadth, depth in the hold and dead rising they
may all differ in the form of their timbers.
We followed the process laid out by these texts in drawing
the Howland shallop. The principal dimensions are predetermined.
The length is 38’ (33’ shallop sawed in half and five feet
added). The beam of 10’4” and the depth amidships, 4’6”, are
based on a rule of proportion from the Treatise on Shipbuilding.
These figures are also within the range of known dimensions
of shallops from the 17th century.
The stem, sternpost and keel were laid out on paper then
the rising and narrowing lines, based on the lines from Plimoth
Plantation’s shallop, were drawn in. It is at this point the
art and science of the 17th-century designer comes together.
We experimented with a number of arcs of circles that would
sweep through the given points and appeared to give us a shape
that looked correct for the mid-ship frame. We made a number
of paper templates and compared them to lines of 17th-century
shallops. When we were satisfied with the shape it was drawn
in and a template made out of thin Plexiglas. This template
was used as the 17th-century boat builder would have used
his pattern to draw in the remaining frame shapes.
With a drawing in hand we could finally begin building the
shallop. But there are more questions that needed, if not
answers, then at least some exploration. The primary one is
the sequence in which the boat is to be built. As in drawing
the vessel the first step is to build the stem, sternpost
and keel, connect them all together and set them up on building
stocks. At this point there are a number of options on how
to proceed.
Dr. Basil Greenhill explores the different methods of building
in his book, The Archaeology of Boats and Ships. He claims
there are two great categories into which vessels of western
history fall. There are boats whose planks are joined edge
to edge and usually, but not always, to strengthening frame
timbers inside the shell of planking; there are also vessels
which are built of planks not joined together, but only to
frames.
The edge-fastened plank boat is constructed by building the
shell of the vessel then fitting in frames to the completed
structure. The other method is to create the skeleton or internal
structure first and then fit planking to the outside. Of course,
there are exceptions to these methods and long periods when
parts of both traditions are used to build a single vessel.
Greenhill sites the “Dutch” method of temporarily edge-fastening
the bottom planks of a vessel into a shell, then adding frames
for the topside to which more planks are added as an example
of a hybrid system. The vessel whose remains are in Pilgrim
Hall Museum in Plymouth, MA is believed to be constructed
in a hybrid fashion.
Another example of a hybrid method can be seen in the Red
Bay Labrador wreck. Dr. Greenhill believes this vessel was
built by setting up some of the principle frames and running
some battens, or thin strips of wood, around the outside of
them. The remaining frames are then made to fit the natural
run of the battens. Greenhill relates there is a wreck of
ca. 1520 at Plymouth, England that has similar structural
features.
It is this method of setting up the backbone and then the
principle frames that we followed with the Howland shallop.
It allowed us to minimize the time it took to make frames
and it yet still gave us control over the shape of the emerging
vessel.The backbone we used is made of white oak purchased
in Connecticut. The white oak tree that became the stem of
the boat came from Norwell, MA and was donated to us by Mr.
David Lazot along with six beautiful white pine trees that
have been sawn up for decking material. All the work was done
with the felling axe, broad axe, splitting wedges, adzes and
the whip saw. We learned a great deal about 17th-century shipbuilding
techniques as the shallop took shape. We learned even more
once we launched it!
|